The word aerobic literally means "with oxygen" or "in the
presence of oxygen." Aerobic exercise is any activity that
uses large muscle groups, can be maintained continuously for
a long period of time and is rhythmic in nature. Aerobic activity
trains the heart, lungs and cardiovascular system to process and
deliver oxygen more quickly and efficiently to every part of the
body. As the heart muscle becomes stronger and more efficient, a
larger amount of blood can be pumped with each stroke.
Fewer strokes are then required to rapidly transport oxygen
to all parts of the body. An aerobically fit individual can
work longer, more vigorously and achieve a quicker recovery
at the end of the aerobic session.
Actually, you're *almost* always burning fat at one rate
or another, but you burn most when your body is in its aerobic
range. A good rule of thumb is that after 20 minutes in your
aerobic zone, you will be burning more fat than carbos. Covert
Bailey, in "Smart Exercise", states that you will be burning
fat after only twelve minutes of aerobic exercise. If you
can increase your aerobic activity to 30 minutes or longer,
you will be burning a larger percentage of calories from fat.
There is still some disagreement as to which is better - longer
duration at lower intensity, or shorter duration at higher
intensity. If you are limited in time, then the higher intensity
will maximize your aerobic benefits in a shorter amount of time.
If you can work for a longer duration at a lower intensity, you
will decrease your chance of injury. If you are interested
in decreasing the amount of fat on your body, the idea is to
use more calories than you take in. Your muscles will continue
to burn fat after both aerobic and anaerobic (muscle training)
exercise.
(from Michael G. Kurilla [mgk2r@uva.pcmail. virginia.edu])
This is perhaps the most common question raised by individuals
exercising for the purpose of either weight loss or simply
weight control. This stems from the recognition that aerobic
exercise is a significant adjunct to any weight loss program,
that is diet plus aerobic exercise produces more weight loss
than diet alone. In addition, the weight lost with exercise
tends to be a higher percentage of fat.
Exercise can be grouped into three broad levels of intensity,
mild, moderate, and high. Mild intensity is a comfortable walking
pace and can be sustained almost indefinitely, moderate intensity
is equal to an average cardiovascular conditioning workout (able
to talk, but not sing) and can be sustained (in a trained individual)
for upwards of 3 - 4 hours, and high intensity is not
able to talk and can only be sustained for 30 - 45 minutes.
Based on recent and very detailed research studies, in terms of
absolute fat burning, a moderate intensity workout burns the most
fat. At a heart rate equal to about 75% of max, fat burning will
approach 0.5 grams - 1.0 grams of fat per minute. There is a weight
dependence with the lower end referring to a 100 pound individual
and the upper end to a 200 pound person. As the duration continues
(greater than 1 hour), fat burning can increase slightly (another
10%).
At a mild intensity, the majority of calories expended (85 - 90%)
are fat calories, but the absolute level is only about 60% of the
moderate intensity. At high intensity levels, fat burning declines
to a level of about 65% of the moderate pace, as sugar burning
supplies the rest. The high rate of sugar burning exhausts the
limited sugar supply in muscles and causes muscular failure.
The only caveats for the above burn rates are that these numbers
are derived from individuals who were already aerobically trained
and were conducted in the AM before breakfast. Less fit individuals
are known to burn less fat and more sugar (part of aerobic
conditioning is greater reliance on fat burning for energy).
Exercising after a meal will tend to promote more sugar burning.
Consumption of sugar during an exercise session will also tend to
retard fat burning in favor of the sugar. These numbers were derived
from cycling and so the absolute numbers can be increased if
exercises that involve more muscle groups are utilized (running,
rowing, etc.). From peak energy production rates for various
exercises, rowers might reach about 40% higher.
You are _always_ burning fat. There is no magic on/off switch for
"fat burning", or any other system in the body. Your body gets its
energy from several sources all the time; the proportions change
depending on the intensity and duration of the activity, but stored
body fat is always one of them.
Stored body fat is utilized more for low- to moderate-intensity,
long-duration activity; this could be where the confusion about
needing to exercise for x number of minutes arises. During the
first several minutes of exercise your body gets started by
tapping primarily (not exclusively!) its more immediate energy
sources, like glycogen in your muscles. These sources cannot keep
up with the continued demand for energy, so your body gradually
taps into stored body fat as well to continue at that intensity.
As an analogy, think of your body as always carrying around a cord
of firewood and a small bottle of jet fuel. The firewood is your
stored body fat, the jet fuel is the glycogen in your muscles. When
you need to suddenly dash for the bus, you use the jet fuel. It
won't get you far because you don't have much, but you can get
there very fast. When you need to go on a long day hike, you use
the firewood--a long, slow burn that can last for hours, and you
have plenty of it. But you always have to use a few drops of jet
fuel to get going while you kindle the firewood, and to keep the
flame bright. And you always have to use the firewood, even if
only as a pilot light.
From this analogy it should be easy to see that it's not possible
to work out ensuring that 100% of your energy is coming from fat--
you couldn't get started, or once started couldn't perform at more
than a "slow smolder" intensity. In fact, many people report
feeling very sluggish if they try to work out in the morning on an
empty stomach, while simply eating a simple high-carbohydrate snack
an hour before yields a much better performance. It takes energy
to make energy!
It may at first come as a surprise to learn that the time when your
body is getting its highest _percentage_ of energy from fat is when
you're asleep! But consider that when you're asleep, your body has
no need for bursts of high intensity activity, so those energy
systems are quiet. Obviously, sleeping is not a good activity for
losing weight, because your total energy requirements are quite low
then. This should show you that the _rate_ at which you burn
fat/calories is not as important as the _total_ that you burn on a
daily basis. In other words, the minute-to-minute fluctuations in
the proportions of fat vs. carbohydrate used by your body are not
linked to long-term weight managment.
If your goal is fat loss, then try to achieve a maximal
_calorie_ burn, and don't worry about a maximal _fat_ burn. As
long as you are expending more calories than you are consuming
-- on a regular and consistent basis -- then the fat/weight will
come off. Any aerobic activity which you enjoy doing enough to
do 3-5 times a week at a moderate intensity for at least 20
continuous minutes at a time will help you burn lots of calories;
dance/step aerobics, bicycling, swimming, basketball, soccer,
running, skating, hiking, and walking are all good examples.
In general, for the average aerobicizer, it doesn't matter
whether you exercise for 2 shorter sessions or 1 longer
session. Keep in mind that your body requires a "warm-up"
period of 5 to 10 minutes and a "cool-down" period of similar
length (cf. section 12). So if you exercise for one 60
minutes period, 40 to 50 minutes of that time would be for
aerobic training with the remainder for warm-up and
cool-down. If you exercise for two 30 minute periods, 10 to
20 minutes of each period or 20 to 40 minutes total, would be
aerobic training.
So if you break up your workout but using the same amount of
time, you might be training aerobically for a shorter amount
of time. Does this really matter? It depends on why you
are aerobically training. If you are interested in training
for an activity like soccar/football or water polo, where
you are actively working aerobically for extended periods of
time, then, yes, it will make a difference. The duration of
the training periods very directly affect the aerobic
capacity of an athlete. For example, if you don't have the
aerobic capacity for swim constantly for the duration of a
water polor game, you aren't going to be able to complete an
entire game.
However, if you are exercising for general fitness and health,
then other issues are important. If it works for you to
exercise in 2 shorter periods, and that is what you are able
to do ,then that is what is best for you. For most of us,
it is more practical to exercise in 1 period, be it long or
short. A very short period of exercise, like a 10 minute
session will have limited aerobic benefits for all but the
most deconditioned because of the warm-up/cool-down
necessities. That doesn't mean that it doesn't have
benefit; it's not aerobic training.
The previous Questions and Answers are excerpted from the
misc.fitness.aerobics Frequently Asked Questions page (FAQ).
http://www.oaktrees.org/fitness/misc.fitness.aerobic.faq.txt